Reflecting on the previous posts I’ve written, I’ve noticed several patterns. One pattern, for example, is a thematic recurrence. I often discuss or reference Dante’s reactions to the souls and the events that take place in Hell or the situations and exchanges he engages in with the souls even when the main focus of the post does not center around this topic. In the post, Farinata’s Attitude in Hell, in which the attitude of a soul who is still preoccupied with the notion of social status is discussed, I noted, “Despite his circumstances, throughout the entire canto, Farinata’s demeanor is calm and collected unlike Dante’s past encounters in which the souls are either sorrowful and pitiful or attempt to put Dante’s life in peril.” Here, it is evident that while the subject of this sentence focuses on Farinata’s bearing, it is used as a comparison to the meetings that Dante has with the other souls. Another example of referencing Dante’s sentiments while the post focuses on another topic is in the previous post entitled “Evil Tail’s Clever Deceit”. In this post, the focus is on the scene where Virgil boldly deals with a group of devils who ultimately end up deceiving him. The clever manner in which they trick Virgil is then connected to the effects it has on Dante. Considering that Dante depends solely on Virgil as his guide, it is understandable that I included this connection in order to make my point. As an example, I notice that, “Although Dante has faith in Virgil’s intelligence and ability to deal with the creatures of Hell, he does not wish to forget this moment for the sake of eluding danger which Virgil fails to do so in canto 21.” Noticably, here, I am taking into consideration Dante’s belief that Virgil is capable of effectively dealing with Hell’s demons while ending the sentence with a change in focus. The change refers back to the central topic of the post which is Virgil’s failure to keep Dante safe in canto 21.
Furthermore, there is another thematic element that is discussed more than once: the constant evolution of Dante’s reactions to the souls. This is clearly illustrated in reflecting on the second post, “Filippo Argenti: The Daring Soul” and the fifth post, “Dante v.s. Pope Nicholas III”. Both posts mention the change in Dante’s response to the discussions he has with the souls. The Filippo Argenti post states, “In past Cantos, Dante would show pity towards souls who would share their stories with him…Here, Dante convey disgust and alarm at Argenti’s daring behavior…” Meanwhile, in the fifth post, I note, “Dante’s reproach is ultimately harsh, blunt and straightforward…In past cantos, the majority of his reactions consist of sorrowful pity or fear.” Evidently, according to these posts, I find it quite interesting that Dante sympathizes strongly with the souls to the point that he even faints. However, in both posts I note this reaction in comparison to the new emotions that he portrays such as disgust or reproach. I believe I focus on this theme consistently because it is important to keep track of the emotional roller coaster that Dante is on. Without following the evolution of Dante’s sentiments as he progresses into the deeper and darker pits of Hell, it would be difficult to understand why he narrates the poem in a certain manner with different linguistic techniques or the different aspects of his relationship with Virgil. Both of these things connect to Dante’s emotions because they are codependent and are crucial to Dante’s physical and mental journey.
I also notice that I have used images in every post excluding the previous one. However, for the most part, I do not discuss the analysis of the text in connection to how the scenes are reflected in those images. I believe, going forward, this would be a useful technique to add to the upcoming posts because it allows for an analysis of how the vivid text is brought to life in a manner that allows me to visualize the harrowing events in Hell.



