Tag Archives: Hell

Justified Punishment

Dante at this point, now fully understands why these sins are punished and how essential it is for the punishment to match the severity of their sins. What I want to find out is why is Lucifer isn’t active throughout Inferno? It would make sense for the king of Hell to apply his might against the dammed throughout Dante and Virgil’s pilgrimage. To help us understand the very nature around Hell and Lucifer let us examine Canto 33 . Here in this Canto, Dante and Virgil are in the ninth circle and they come across a sinner named Count Ugonilo who chews the neck of his killer and betrayer, Archbishop Ruggieri. Both of these men are betrayers, but what’s important to note is how Ugonilo acts for his sins: “That sinner raised his mouth from his fierce meal, / then used the head that he had ripped apart / in back; he wiped his lips upon it’s hair.” (Alighieri 1-3).  Ugonilo attacks the man who betrayed with anger and disgust. There is hate in those bites. It’s evident here that wrath has made Ugonilo go insane with rage.

Examining Canto 34, Virgil and Dante are in the City of Dis. They meet the king of Hell who stands in the middle showing no emotions(I will discuss about Lucifer nature later). Lucifer has three heads to which each mouth contains a sinner: Judas, who betrayed Jesus Christ, Brutus and Cassius both of whom betrayed Julius Caesar.  All three men are chewed and shredded, never dying: “Within each mouth he used it like a grinder/ with gnashing teeth he tore to bits a sinner, / so that he bought much pain to three at once.(Alighieri 55-57).  According to this, these sinners are forever in a state of perpetual agony. Notice that these sinners are expressing emotion unlike Lucifer himself. With these examples in mind, I believe Dante meant to show the readers that although the sinners are touched by evil. They still remain human. Pure evil has no traces of humanity, which would make sense since Lucifer is evil incarnate.

There is an interesting note about Purgatory that further explains the presence of sins around humans and perhaps Dante’s intentions about the sinner’s circumstances. In Canto 1 of Purgatory, Dante and Virgil meet Cato, a Roman Politician who is famous for his defiance of Julius Caesar.  What fascinating about this sinner Cato is the fact he killed himself as a form of freedom from Julius Caesar as explain by Virgil, “You know it who, in Utica, found death/ for freedom was not bitter, when you left/ the garb that will be bright on the great day.”(Alighieri 73-75). Since we’ve come to know that suicide is a crime against God, it’s problematic to see Cato’s role in this realm. To understand why Cato is in Purgatory instead of Hell we must remember that Dante based his morality on Aristotle’s schema. According to Aristotle, death by suicide is a crime against one’s society, but in Cato’s case his society was conquer by Julius Caesar. Rather than being in part of the new society by the conqueror, he decided to free himself by suicide. This is why there is a special case for Cato Presence, for his actions is proof his incorruptible nature.

 

The Punishment of Satan/The Contrapasso of Lucifer

Dante and Virgil Encounter Lucifer in Hell, 1923 Giclee Print by Henry John Stock

In Canto 34, Dante is introduced to Satan, “the creature who had once been beautiful.” (17-18) Dante’s descriptions of Satan are haunting, so haunting that Dante pauses the dialogue to engage the reader stating: “I became frozen and feeble, do not ask reader, for I do not write it, and all speech would be insufficient.” (22-24) But Satan’s real punishment isn’t just his eternal fate in hell. He’s doomed to forever be one with hell, punishing not only Judas, Brutus, and Cassius, but also the other members of the 9th circle with the cold beats of his bat-like wings. In other words, he’s reduced to a mechanism of hell, equivalent to other beasts and lower forms we’ve seen in other Cantos, like Cerberus or Plutus from upper hell.

The contrapasso of Lucifer is very evident. Not only through his punishment, but Dante’s descriptions of Lucifer. Almost without exception Dante refers to Satan’s prior perfection, literally a “light-bearer,” the translation of Lucifer: “If he was as beautiful then as now he is ugly, when he lifted his brow against his Maker.” (34-35) This further develops the idea of his punishment. A rebel against God, he is now doomed to forever remain a mechanism of God’s divine justice. A punishment to others who also violated God’s divine authority.

Lucifer’s physical punishment also reflects this contrapasso. Massive in size, but rooted in ice, Lucifer is both incredibly intimidating but at the same time utterly docile. This is further illustrated by his utter silence throughout the canto, forced to continue God’s will and chew sinners for eternally with three mouths, a parallel to the trinity.

I think that the geology of lower hell is very interesting, especially in reference to Satan. As Virgil and Dante leave the 9th circle to exit hell, Dante describes how “I raised my eyes, thinking to see Lucifer as I had left him, and I saw that he extended his legs upward.” (88-89) I like to think that this is a reference to the 8th circle, 3rd Bolgia, in which the feet of simonists are engulfed in flame. In a certain way, Satan too used his position in a different context for personal gain.

Ultimately, I think that the punishment of Lucifer is a poetic and powerful transition into Purgatorio. I think that because of Lucifer’s silence in the Canto and his diminished state as a mechanism of hell reflects the punishment of sinners in the Anti-Inferno, who aren’t recognized at all. While Satan is recognized, he isn’t glorified or even dignified by speech, as other sinners have been. He’s simply condemned to his fate and eternally frozen in the absence of God’s light, and warmth.

Progression of the Recognition of Sin

Sandro Botticelli, Canto XVIII, colored drawing on parchment, C.1480

Dante and Virgil Traversing the first two Boglia of the Eighth Circle

Early in the Inferno, we can see the idea of recognition and remembrance of sinners. Dante’s interactions early in the Inferno with Francesca and Paulo, as well as his later interactions with Brunetto Latini show that the sinners of the higher Inferno are more focused on their own sufferings and past lives on Earth. Francesca, Paulo, Ciacco, and the other sinners Dante encounters before lower hell even actively want to speak to Dante and tell him of their plight, or ask him about the living.

However as we enter the 8th circle, we’re welcomed by a new caliber of sin, and a new attitude towards Virgil and Dante. Where sinners like Farinata or Cavalcante in the 6th circle wanted to speak to the pilgrim, we’re now met by Venedico Caccianemico, and Alessio Interminei of Lucca. Both of these sinners respond in a similar way, and both reside in the first and second (respectively) Boglia of the 8th circle.

Venedico is initially recognized by Dante as he “thought to hide by lowering his face,”(46-47) and when prompted by Dante, concedes: “Unwilling I say it, but your clear speech compels me, reminding me of the former world.”(52-54) Venedico is so ashamed by his actions in the real world, in which he pimped his own sister. Unlike sinners in higher hell, Venedico shows a higher level of regret for his actions and his state in society that he attempts to avert even the gaze of Dante. Alessio too feels this shame, and a strange perspective on his own sin. He says to Dante: “Why are you so hungry to look more at me than the other filthy ones? . . . I am submerged down here by the flatteries with which my tongue was never cloyed.” (118-126) Alessio not only feels shame, but also uses the metaphor of being “submerged down here by the flatteries with which my tongue was never cloyed,” in which he describes that he’s surrounded by excrement, something his tongue was never disgusted by as a flatterer.

The idea that these sinners now wish to not be recognized for their sin is interesting, not only because of the idea that these sinners are starting to regret their own actions while alive, but also because of the contrast between these circles and the anti-inferno of Canto 3. In the anti-inferno we’re introduced to the neutrals: angels who allied themselves to neither God or Satan, and humans with a lack of affiliation. These souls are punished, but unlike the other souls of the Inferno receive no infamy or praise. Those in Hell, while punished, also receive a degree of infamy and the possibility of remembrance. Those in the anti-inferno are briefly touched upon in the 3rd canto, and not one is recognized. The contrast between this canto and the 8th circle where sinners start to wish to remain unidentified is interesting to me. It really illustrates the idea that both calibers of sin are punished in almost an equal regard. Both wish for the opposite, one hoping for recognition, and the other anonymity.

I found this parallel fascinating, because I feel that this exemplifies Dante’s idea of contrapasso, only in this example across the circles of hell. A contrapasso of punishments rather than a contrapasso of sin and punishment. Though I’m unsure if sinners in the anti-inferno would prefer to be punished in the 8th circle, they certainly want the recognition the Inferno and God’s divine plan give to other sinners, whereas the opposite is true for the sinners in the 8th circle.

Capaneus’s Hell

In canto 14, Dante and Virgil encounter a soul called Capaneus, through which the reader is introduced to a new concept. Barolini describes it: “Hell is a condition in which the soul is permanently oneself as one was on earth- unrepentant and unameliorated, with no hope of change or growth,” (Barolini). In other words, instead of considering Hell as a place for souls that are forced to pay for their sins in eternal anguish, Barolini refers to it as a “condition”. A condition is defined as a mindset, in this case, untouched and unaffected by the circumstances in which the soul dwells. Despite the horrific punishment Capaneus endures, his pride and confidence in himself as a warrior is unshaken. There is no possibility that his outlook will succumb to the ongoing pressure to repent. The eternal suffering, presence of demons and the cries of the anguished do not seem to bother Capaneus in the slightest. As Capaneus bluntly puts it, “…As I/ was alive, so am I dead,” (50-51). This arrogant demeanor is a clear example that when someone does not show evidence of guilt or remorse for any transgression they commit in their living days, it cannot be expected of them to do so when they descend into Hell.

In response to this superior attitude, Virgil retorts, ” ‘O Capaneus, since your pride is not extinguished, you are punished more; no punishment, other than your rage, would be suffering of a measure with your fury,” (62-5). Virgil wishes to express here that as long as Capaneus’s pride is still intact, this, in itself, is punishment enough for the soul. The anger and fury that embodies Capaneus because of his stubborness and possible belief that he does not belong in Hell will keep him in distress for all eternity. Therefore, Capaneus must be forced to deal with his crimes for all of eternity. Barolini summarizes this point by stating that the soul “…is stuck with its self”. Furthermore, he considers, “If the motto of the sinners here is that they are now what they always were, then in effect these sinners create their own Hell”. Capaneus’s perspective on his position in Hell entails the likelihood that all sinners are exactly as they were in the living world. With this in mind, the souls are making an illusion of a Hell that solely belongs to them. Although this does not exclude them from punishment, it seems far less cruel than the punishments forcefully inflicted upon them because they are choosing to remain as they have always been and as a result, are choosing their own destinies in Hell. This is especially appealing for the souls of the third subcircle within the seventh circle, where Capaneus dwells, because their sins pertain to violence against God. If their unchanging personas allow for a fabricated Hell, this, in turn, signifies that they’re evading and going against God’s punishments which He deems appropriate for the souls and are being punished by their own terms.

Dante and Virgil meet Capaneus, Title: Capaneus, Illustration by William Blake, Source: Danteworlds (UTexas)

The Deceitful Are Punished


In canto 11 of Inferno Dante and Virgil reach the edge of a cliff in which lower parts of hell are visible to  Dante and Virgil. Dante can already smell that horrible smell that is rising from down below. The two poets take pause during continuing their journey and see a vault with these words written on it: “of a great tomb, on which I made out this,inscribed: ‘I hold Pope Anastasius enticed to leave the true path by Photinus.’” (Digital Dante, note to lines 7-9, canto 11).  The imagery of the vault shows how Dante believes that Pope Anastasius accepted the heresy of Acacius patriarch of Constantinople. Acadius believed that Christ possessed only a human nature and denied that Christ had a  divine power. Therefore, Pope Anastasius is punished by God—because a pope is supposed to be God’s follower and supposed to believe in God’s power, for God was placed on earth by his father to show humans he was the survivor and the only Christ but Pope Anastasius rejects God hence breaking the promise/ trust he has with God. Therefore, popes who are also humans are capable of doing corrupt things; although Popes are mostly devoted to God and are a symbol of purity, Popes can be still choose evilness because they are capable of straying away from God and are capable of straying away from the path of goodness because they are mortal and humane. This quote relates to the overall theme of this canto because while Dante and Virgil are waiting, Virgil explains the different section of hell. Looking down into hell, Virgil says that there are three circles of hell within the cliffs and the circles that commit more monstrous deeds, receive more serious punishments deeper in hell. Fraud is the most damned sin because it is the opposite of love. Fraud breaks the promise of love because fraud destroys faith/ trust. Therefore, Pope Anastasius receives the worst punishment because he committed a sinful crime such as turning away from God, the connection he has with God is now broken. God no longer trusts him, hence Pope Anastasius broke the love between him and God because the pope was deceitful towards God not believing in God for whom he really was and denying God’s divinity. Furthermore, Virgil says that those who commit wrongdoings against heaven end up getting punished, these punishers go to the lowest parts of Hell. Therefore, Francesca and Paolo weren’t placed in the lowest part of hell because their intimacy and love for one another was stronger than the actual punishment itself.